I swear, man, that morphic field is absolutely demanding to be heard lately.
About a month ago, someone online* recommended that I pick up a copy of the book "Morphic Resonance" by Sheldrake, which I did, then promptly forgot about the buried book until a few days ago, when my boyfriend saw it mentioned online and asked me if we had a copy. Two days later, someone else very close to me asked about that same book. Now I see it mentioned here ... Seems like it is REALLY asking to be read.
*In reviewing one of my previous articles on the aether, it looks as if that "someone" may have been Grok, and that it was way more than a month ago ... I wrote a very similar article to this one (though a bit more verbose than yours) back in February, and followed it up with a Grok conversation in which it mentioned Morphic Resonance.
Interesting. Fabulous to encourage people to think for themselves. First, science does not deny the aether, they just call it something else. Read "The Order of Time" by Carlo Rovelli. Second, I am curious about the lack of referencing. AI is like Wikipedia for truth and reliability. Not very (true or reliable).
There's an Alan Watts lecture I love that talks about how modern science disconnecting us from nature has been devastating for our species spiritual development. He was talking about this stuff in the 60s, thinking about how much worse society has gotten since then is mind boggling.
Exceptional piece! Thank you for writing this, it's sparked something from long ago. Much appreciation 🥰🙏❤️
Best explanation I have read as to what disservice has taken place to humanity, our time.... thank you for this great work!
thanks Christina! so glad it resonated with you! truly one of the greates disservice indeed. thanks so much for the time in reading and commenting!
I swear, man, that morphic field is absolutely demanding to be heard lately.
About a month ago, someone online* recommended that I pick up a copy of the book "Morphic Resonance" by Sheldrake, which I did, then promptly forgot about the buried book until a few days ago, when my boyfriend saw it mentioned online and asked me if we had a copy. Two days later, someone else very close to me asked about that same book. Now I see it mentioned here ... Seems like it is REALLY asking to be read.
*In reviewing one of my previous articles on the aether, it looks as if that "someone" may have been Grok, and that it was way more than a month ago ... I wrote a very similar article to this one (though a bit more verbose than yours) back in February, and followed it up with a Grok conversation in which it mentioned Morphic Resonance.
https://prometheuslost.substack.com/p/could-the-aether-be-real
https://prometheuslost.substack.com/p/on-the-aether-continued
Interesting to me that AI has no problem being coaxed to buck the orthodoxy when it comes to the aether discussion ...
Hear ya, In Unity and Resonance Bro.
Interesting. Fabulous to encourage people to think for themselves. First, science does not deny the aether, they just call it something else. Read "The Order of Time" by Carlo Rovelli. Second, I am curious about the lack of referencing. AI is like Wikipedia for truth and reliability. Not very (true or reliable).
There's an Alan Watts lecture I love that talks about how modern science disconnecting us from nature has been devastating for our species spiritual development. He was talking about this stuff in the 60s, thinking about how much worse society has gotten since then is mind boggling.
Brother, you may enjoy the new series I am working on called the Lantern Unified Theory. It will address this issue and more.
Science fucked up when it assumed consciousness as a side effect of matter and biology.
No.
Consciousness IS primary and matter is emergent.
This resolves the paradoxes and answers the questions.
I'll be rolling it out over the next few weeks.