You mean AI would lie to us about it not being good for us? So defensive that AI, it must have an inferiority complex.
The myth that wireless (non-ionizing radiation) is doesn't harm us is based on the the limits set by ICNIRP, which aseert that DNA strands can't be broken, however they in fact can, just not through the same pathway as intense ionizing radiation:
You mean AI would lie to us about it not being good for us? So defensive that AI, it must have an inferiority complex.
The myth that wireless (non-ionizing radiation) is doesn't harm us is based on the the limits set by ICNIRP, which aseert that DNA strands can't be broken, however they in fact can, just not through the same pathway as intense ionizing radiation:
https://romanshapoval.substack.com/p/safetymyth
Thank you Franklin for sharing all these resources.
Put an AM radio next to a cell phone, and hear the emissions.
Re-stacked today. AI is still an infant.... and like all infants all it will do is copy parental bad habits.
It is incapable of thinking outside of the box and being innovative. It cannot put unrelated things together and foresee impending doom.
I have never consulted AI except to draw me a couple of images and I didn't think much of the results.