"Why It Does Matter..."

“Anthony Fauci will go down in the Roman Overlord’s Hall of Fame. For the past 30 years, he has convinced the world about the reality of viruses, from HIV to the coronavirus pandemic. He has taken something invisible, something unproven, and convinced the world to not only believe in it but to invest in it, ensuring every citizen received this new petrochemical shot.”

Denis Rancourt a leading figure in the community known for his data-driven research, made a startling announcement during an interview with Steve Kirsch, another prominent member of the truth movement. Rancourt stated that he could find no evidence to prove the existence of viruses. Shout out to dpl for capturing this¹.

From Denis: “I’m not convinced that viruses exist.”

This bold statement has sparked intense debate and discussion as I have touched on myself in my article, Lies Not Discussed Within The Truth Community. Even though in the video you see Kirsch’s immediate shift of focus, the implications of Rancourt’s declaration cannot be ignored.

Contrary to the belief that such a topic is divisive, I argue that it is, in fact, liberating and unifying. It shatters illusions and exposes the fallacies upon which entire industries have been built. This article will delve into the significance of Rancor’s proclamation, its implications, and why many find it difficult to abandon long-held narratives.

PS: My book delves into the world of industrial illusions, exposing how these smoke and mirrors have shaped our society and how we can break free from them.

So, please sit back and relax as we embark on this enlightening journey. It promises to be an engaging read.

---

Denis Rancourt: The Man Behind the Statement

To fully appreciate the gravity of Rancourt’s statement, it’s essential to understand who he is. Denis Rancourt, a former professor of physics at the University of Ottawa, is a respected figure in the academic truth community. His research, particularly his paper asserting that there was no pandemic², has been influential in shaping public discourse.

Rancourt’s paper, which meticulously analyzes data to argue that the pandemic was not novel, is highly recommended for its insightful conclusions. It suggests that the situation would have remained unchanged if no measures had been taken. This perspective is echoed in my previous article, which discusses how specific policies, such as the use of ventilators, led to millions of deaths.

Rancourt’s work also highlights the need to consider other factors that could manifest as viral illnesses. He suggests that vaccine manufacturers were aware of these factors, a topic I explore in my article on unspoken lies within the truth community.