Jul 31, 2023·edited Jul 31, 2023Liked by Franklin O'Kanu
Damn! Granted I haven't read Huxley or Orwell since high school but the idea that Huxley admired the narcissistic ruling elite rather than being motivated to warn us about them is new to me. Or do I misunderstand?
The term "magic" is very much a loaded term. As an American, I am very familiar with the materialistic view of reality but also as a Bible believing student I have a "spiritual" paradigm of the universe and reality. I find it interesting that the Bible labels views of spirituality that are antithetical to the Biblical view akin to practices we call magic. I prefer the term spirituality to refer to that part of our existence that is beyond the strictly material.
It's also interesting that "magic", in a popular sense, is now being heavily promoted to the younger generation in the media and entertainment. This is all part of the elites brainwashing of the masses. They have got us to the point where the majority are willing to voluntarily march into the death clinics for their magic injection just as the German Jews voluntarily boarded the cattle cars for the extermination camps. That is indeed magic.
Thanks for this comment Phil! Couple thoughts from me:
1. So that's how I'm interpreting it, that Huxley and Orwell looked up to the elite. I could be wrong and certainly open to discussion, but Huxley stating that "Brave New World would come true because it's more realistic" tells me that he was part of the inner circle. This becomes even more evident when we take his family history into consideration.
2. 1000% agree that "magic" is a loaded term. I was raised pentacostal christian and looking at the phenomena of miracles and of synchronicity, one comes to the conclusion that we're talking about the same thing, but with different terminology.
3. I also agree wholeheartedly with you on the "spiritual" paradigm, and I'm working on an article now which argues that our reality is more spiritual than it is physical and we need to focus more on the spirituality because if we do that, we then positively change our physical. This is the core behind my upcoming book as well. Here are some links on this concept of "spirituality being reality" that I've written about:
....but Huxley stating that "Brave New World would come true because it's more realistic" tells me that he was part of the inner circle. This becomes even more evident when we take his family history into consideration...
To your first point, I'm sure both Huxley's and Orwell's backgrounds informed their understanding that resulted in what they wrote. Huxley may even have come out of that background. But I have not seen in either of their books evidence that they were advocating for a dystopia. Quite the contrary.
For example: Daverkb is a solid, conservative Christian who was raised among the elite. As a result, he is very knowledgeable about their proclivities yet considers himself to be apart from them.
Huxley wrote a lot of books I have not read. If someone has read them, they should be able to tell us if he is informing or advocating.
I attended an Art Festival this past Sunday. I was surprised by the number of booths displaying “black magic” or evil type symbolism (us older folks view it that way). It’s apparently become mainstream, normalized & cool. Personally, to me, its cheap, bad ugly art.
Interesting ideas. I would make one minor change: Orwell and Huxley were both British authors, so the notion that they are part of American history isn’t quite right, even though most of us read the books in either a World Literature or British Literature class in high school. An American contribution to the conversation might be Ray Bradbury, particularly Fahrenheit 451.
Thanks for this correction Stephanie! I appreciate this! And the recommendation on Fahrenheit 51! I haven’t dove into it yet, but this is a callout to do so!
I found the following comment from Doug Casey's International Man to be exactly what you were describing:
Wikipedia now divides all publications, pundits, and others as either truth tellers or far-right conspiracy advocates. The real issue here isn’t farting cows any more than it’s whether men can have babies. These are mere exercises.
So, if we take a step back and consider an overview of what this all means – why it’s so prevalent and why the process is being so consistently utilized – we might be conclude the following:
The issues are absurdly extreme for a reason. The objective is not the achievement of the issues themselves. It is the alteration of the psyche of the populace.
Once the public has spent several years having their heads divided between "far-right extremism" and what’s approved by the Ministry of Truth, enough people will have been converted into non-thinking proles that a bill can be put forward with the broad and intentionally non-specific objective to outlaw far-right extremism in all its forms.
In order to assure the passage of the bill, a significant majority of people will have to have already reached the stage in their new thought process that they feel that the law is not only justified but essential. Those people who can still think will be expected to comply.
The goal is not the elimination of cows; it’s the elimination of thinking and dissent. If we keep the above in mind as a process rather than an intended outcome, we have a greater ability to focus on the critical issue.
The core objective is nothing less than the elimination of individual thought and dissent. It’s essential in the creation of a fully collectivist state, and it’s at the very heart of the overall globalist objective.
Here's some magic that fits right into what you and Huxley are talking about. I don't know what scarier, this or the clots!
In this video, experts explain how the mRNA “trans”jections not only cause physical damage to organs but how they also damage the small capillaries in the brain, override the blood-brain barrier and eventually, lead to massive personality changes. They also discussed how the mRNA injections are literally breaking the will of some of those who received them.
The discussion took place during an International Crimes Investigative Committee (“ICIC”) session held last month. Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich interviewed Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor Dr. Karina Reiss, Dr. Naomi Wolf and Dr. Peter R. Breggin.
Man, after being exposed to the last couple of years, I don't know if we can even get scared anymore because something is always on the horizon.
Going of our topic on "spiritual," many years ago, I once heard that we are currently in a spiritual war and that if you look at war, the species that protects in any war, it's the "male" species. If this theory is correct, then we can see why males have been attack for a while now. From the chemicals in the water, to the shots (which affect males more) to vaccines (which affect boys more), we can start to see how this is an attack which is going after the male species, the protector species.
Here's an article on this topic if interested as well:
In Brave New World Revisited, Huxley expands on what had occurred between the publishing of Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited(1932 and 1958 respectively). With the advent of television he points to different proofs of psychological techniques that were being perfected. Aldous was also privy to the Macys Conferences on Cybernetics and although he doesn’t mention it by name, I’m sure when he discusses these techniques he is thinking of that. Huxley also mentions the explosion of sociology degrees on college campuses and how these sociologists will be used to steer people. Huxley’s address to Berkeley students (which can be found online) is key.
While you consider it to be preconditioning, I've always operated from the Jungian perspective that the artists and writers tap into a Collective, which is wiser than the individual, and in opening to that channel, can be extremely prophetic. Not as a plan, but as a harbinger.
I find the notion that Orwell and Huxley were Machiavellians to be ridiculous. Both of the novels illustrate the dangers of the forms of oligarchic hegemony which have been growing from strength to strength through the manipulation of technology and control of the mass media. Both men were staunch proponents of individual freedom and creativity, and equal rights for all.
Your essay analyzing, comparing and contrasting the esteemed authors Huxley and Orwell is very accurate. A few years ago, I attempted to write a similar essay but encountered severe censorship from my college.
Damn! Granted I haven't read Huxley or Orwell since high school but the idea that Huxley admired the narcissistic ruling elite rather than being motivated to warn us about them is new to me. Or do I misunderstand?
The term "magic" is very much a loaded term. As an American, I am very familiar with the materialistic view of reality but also as a Bible believing student I have a "spiritual" paradigm of the universe and reality. I find it interesting that the Bible labels views of spirituality that are antithetical to the Biblical view akin to practices we call magic. I prefer the term spirituality to refer to that part of our existence that is beyond the strictly material.
It's also interesting that "magic", in a popular sense, is now being heavily promoted to the younger generation in the media and entertainment. This is all part of the elites brainwashing of the masses. They have got us to the point where the majority are willing to voluntarily march into the death clinics for their magic injection just as the German Jews voluntarily boarded the cattle cars for the extermination camps. That is indeed magic.
Thanks for this comment Phil! Couple thoughts from me:
1. So that's how I'm interpreting it, that Huxley and Orwell looked up to the elite. I could be wrong and certainly open to discussion, but Huxley stating that "Brave New World would come true because it's more realistic" tells me that he was part of the inner circle. This becomes even more evident when we take his family history into consideration.
2. 1000% agree that "magic" is a loaded term. I was raised pentacostal christian and looking at the phenomena of miracles and of synchronicity, one comes to the conclusion that we're talking about the same thing, but with different terminology.
3. I also agree wholeheartedly with you on the "spiritual" paradigm, and I'm working on an article now which argues that our reality is more spiritual than it is physical and we need to focus more on the spirituality because if we do that, we then positively change our physical. This is the core behind my upcoming book as well. Here are some links on this concept of "spirituality being reality" that I've written about:
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-spiritual-perspective-of-reality
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-spirituality-of-flat-earth
https://www.unorthodoxtruth.com/
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-religious-tenants-of-scientism
Looking forward to more dialogue on this topic!
....but Huxley stating that "Brave New World would come true because it's more realistic" tells me that he was part of the inner circle. This becomes even more evident when we take his family history into consideration...
To your first point, I'm sure both Huxley's and Orwell's backgrounds informed their understanding that resulted in what they wrote. Huxley may even have come out of that background. But I have not seen in either of their books evidence that they were advocating for a dystopia. Quite the contrary.
For example: Daverkb is a solid, conservative Christian who was raised among the elite. As a result, he is very knowledgeable about their proclivities yet considers himself to be apart from them.
Huxley wrote a lot of books I have not read. If someone has read them, they should be able to tell us if he is informing or advocating.
Yes❣️
I attended an Art Festival this past Sunday. I was surprised by the number of booths displaying “black magic” or evil type symbolism (us older folks view it that way). It’s apparently become mainstream, normalized & cool. Personally, to me, its cheap, bad ugly art.
Fabulous truth
Interesting ideas. I would make one minor change: Orwell and Huxley were both British authors, so the notion that they are part of American history isn’t quite right, even though most of us read the books in either a World Literature or British Literature class in high school. An American contribution to the conversation might be Ray Bradbury, particularly Fahrenheit 451.
Thanks for this correction Stephanie! I appreciate this! And the recommendation on Fahrenheit 51! I haven’t dove into it yet, but this is a callout to do so!
It was my favorite American literature book to teach. Prescient.
I found the following comment from Doug Casey's International Man to be exactly what you were describing:
Wikipedia now divides all publications, pundits, and others as either truth tellers or far-right conspiracy advocates. The real issue here isn’t farting cows any more than it’s whether men can have babies. These are mere exercises.
So, if we take a step back and consider an overview of what this all means – why it’s so prevalent and why the process is being so consistently utilized – we might be conclude the following:
The issues are absurdly extreme for a reason. The objective is not the achievement of the issues themselves. It is the alteration of the psyche of the populace.
Once the public has spent several years having their heads divided between "far-right extremism" and what’s approved by the Ministry of Truth, enough people will have been converted into non-thinking proles that a bill can be put forward with the broad and intentionally non-specific objective to outlaw far-right extremism in all its forms.
In order to assure the passage of the bill, a significant majority of people will have to have already reached the stage in their new thought process that they feel that the law is not only justified but essential. Those people who can still think will be expected to comply.
The goal is not the elimination of cows; it’s the elimination of thinking and dissent. If we keep the above in mind as a process rather than an intended outcome, we have a greater ability to focus on the critical issue.
The core objective is nothing less than the elimination of individual thought and dissent. It’s essential in the creation of a fully collectivist state, and it’s at the very heart of the overall globalist objective.
Here's some magic that fits right into what you and Huxley are talking about. I don't know what scarier, this or the clots!
In this video, experts explain how the mRNA “trans”jections not only cause physical damage to organs but how they also damage the small capillaries in the brain, override the blood-brain barrier and eventually, lead to massive personality changes. They also discussed how the mRNA injections are literally breaking the will of some of those who received them.
The discussion took place during an International Crimes Investigative Committee (“ICIC”) session held last month. Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich interviewed Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor Dr. Karina Reiss, Dr. Naomi Wolf and Dr. Peter R. Breggin.
https://expose-news.com/2023/07/29/why-do-peoples-personalities-change-following-covid-vaccination/
Man, after being exposed to the last couple of years, I don't know if we can even get scared anymore because something is always on the horizon.
Going of our topic on "spiritual," many years ago, I once heard that we are currently in a spiritual war and that if you look at war, the species that protects in any war, it's the "male" species. If this theory is correct, then we can see why males have been attack for a while now. From the chemicals in the water, to the shots (which affect males more) to vaccines (which affect boys more), we can start to see how this is an attack which is going after the male species, the protector species.
Here's an article on this topic if interested as well:
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/elmo-and-a-rock
I've noticed this. Eyes glazed, following the herd, spouting things they heard on the teevee, acting like humans - but - not all there.
What I want to know, is can the shot be transcended?
In Brave New World Revisited, Huxley expands on what had occurred between the publishing of Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited(1932 and 1958 respectively). With the advent of television he points to different proofs of psychological techniques that were being perfected. Aldous was also privy to the Macys Conferences on Cybernetics and although he doesn’t mention it by name, I’m sure when he discusses these techniques he is thinking of that. Huxley also mentions the explosion of sociology degrees on college campuses and how these sociologists will be used to steer people. Huxley’s address to Berkeley students (which can be found online) is key.
While you consider it to be preconditioning, I've always operated from the Jungian perspective that the artists and writers tap into a Collective, which is wiser than the individual, and in opening to that channel, can be extremely prophetic. Not as a plan, but as a harbinger.
I find the notion that Orwell and Huxley were Machiavellians to be ridiculous. Both of the novels illustrate the dangers of the forms of oligarchic hegemony which have been growing from strength to strength through the manipulation of technology and control of the mass media. Both men were staunch proponents of individual freedom and creativity, and equal rights for all.
Your essay analyzing, comparing and contrasting the esteemed authors Huxley and Orwell is very accurate. A few years ago, I attempted to write a similar essay but encountered severe censorship from my college.
- Luc
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Luc-Lelievre
Hi. Being British i’ll call out the fact that both these incredible authors are from Britain. Particularly, English.
Farenheit 451 - I watched the film last night and I need to find the book because it is incredible.
Will comment more on the magic soon but just wanted to correct this. American’s get so much, allow us our Huxley and Orwell 😅☺️