Jul 31, 2023·edited Jul 31, 2023Liked by Franklin O'Kanu
Damn! Granted I haven't read Huxley or Orwell since high school but the idea that Huxley admired the narcissistic ruling elite rather than being motivated to warn us about them is new to me. Or do I misunderstand?
The term "magic" is very much a loaded term. As an American, I am very familiar with the materialistic view of reality but also as a Bible believing student I have a "spiritual" paradigm of the universe and reality. I find it interesting that the Bible labels views of spirituality that are antithetical to the Biblical view akin to practices we call magic. I prefer the term spirituality to refer to that part of our existence that is beyond the strictly material.
It's also interesting that "magic", in a popular sense, is now being heavily promoted to the younger generation in the media and entertainment. This is all part of the elites brainwashing of the masses. They have got us to the point where the majority are willing to voluntarily march into the death clinics for their magic injection just as the German Jews voluntarily boarded the cattle cars for the extermination camps. That is indeed magic.
Interesting ideas. I would make one minor change: Orwell and Huxley were both British authors, so the notion that they are part of American history isn’t quite right, even though most of us read the books in either a World Literature or British Literature class in high school. An American contribution to the conversation might be Ray Bradbury, particularly Fahrenheit 451.
I found the following comment from Doug Casey's International Man to be exactly what you were describing:
Wikipedia now divides all publications, pundits, and others as either truth tellers or far-right conspiracy advocates. The real issue here isn’t farting cows any more than it’s whether men can have babies. These are mere exercises.
So, if we take a step back and consider an overview of what this all means – why it’s so prevalent and why the process is being so consistently utilized – we might be conclude the following:
The issues are absurdly extreme for a reason. The objective is not the achievement of the issues themselves. It is the alteration of the psyche of the populace.
Once the public has spent several years having their heads divided between "far-right extremism" and what’s approved by the Ministry of Truth, enough people will have been converted into non-thinking proles that a bill can be put forward with the broad and intentionally non-specific objective to outlaw far-right extremism in all its forms.
In order to assure the passage of the bill, a significant majority of people will have to have already reached the stage in their new thought process that they feel that the law is not only justified but essential. Those people who can still think will be expected to comply.
The goal is not the elimination of cows; it’s the elimination of thinking and dissent. If we keep the above in mind as a process rather than an intended outcome, we have a greater ability to focus on the critical issue.
The core objective is nothing less than the elimination of individual thought and dissent. It’s essential in the creation of a fully collectivist state, and it’s at the very heart of the overall globalist objective.
Here's some magic that fits right into what you and Huxley are talking about. I don't know what scarier, this or the clots!
In this video, experts explain how the mRNA “trans”jections not only cause physical damage to organs but how they also damage the small capillaries in the brain, override the blood-brain barrier and eventually, lead to massive personality changes. They also discussed how the mRNA injections are literally breaking the will of some of those who received them.
The discussion took place during an International Crimes Investigative Committee (“ICIC”) session held last month. Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich interviewed Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor Dr. Karina Reiss, Dr. Naomi Wolf and Dr. Peter R. Breggin.
In Brave New World Revisited, Huxley expands on what had occurred between the publishing of Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited(1932 and 1958 respectively). With the advent of television he points to different proofs of psychological techniques that were being perfected. Aldous was also privy to the Macys Conferences on Cybernetics and although he doesn’t mention it by name, I’m sure when he discusses these techniques he is thinking of that. Huxley also mentions the explosion of sociology degrees on college campuses and how these sociologists will be used to steer people. Huxley’s address to Berkeley students (which can be found online) is key.
While you consider it to be preconditioning, I've always operated from the Jungian perspective that the artists and writers tap into a Collective, which is wiser than the individual, and in opening to that channel, can be extremely prophetic. Not as a plan, but as a harbinger.
I find the notion that Orwell and Huxley were Machiavellians to be ridiculous. Both of the novels illustrate the dangers of the forms of oligarchic hegemony which have been growing from strength to strength through the manipulation of technology and control of the mass media. Both men were staunch proponents of individual freedom and creativity, and equal rights for all.
Damn! Granted I haven't read Huxley or Orwell since high school but the idea that Huxley admired the narcissistic ruling elite rather than being motivated to warn us about them is new to me. Or do I misunderstand?
The term "magic" is very much a loaded term. As an American, I am very familiar with the materialistic view of reality but also as a Bible believing student I have a "spiritual" paradigm of the universe and reality. I find it interesting that the Bible labels views of spirituality that are antithetical to the Biblical view akin to practices we call magic. I prefer the term spirituality to refer to that part of our existence that is beyond the strictly material.
It's also interesting that "magic", in a popular sense, is now being heavily promoted to the younger generation in the media and entertainment. This is all part of the elites brainwashing of the masses. They have got us to the point where the majority are willing to voluntarily march into the death clinics for their magic injection just as the German Jews voluntarily boarded the cattle cars for the extermination camps. That is indeed magic.
Interesting ideas. I would make one minor change: Orwell and Huxley were both British authors, so the notion that they are part of American history isn’t quite right, even though most of us read the books in either a World Literature or British Literature class in high school. An American contribution to the conversation might be Ray Bradbury, particularly Fahrenheit 451.
I found the following comment from Doug Casey's International Man to be exactly what you were describing:
Wikipedia now divides all publications, pundits, and others as either truth tellers or far-right conspiracy advocates. The real issue here isn’t farting cows any more than it’s whether men can have babies. These are mere exercises.
So, if we take a step back and consider an overview of what this all means – why it’s so prevalent and why the process is being so consistently utilized – we might be conclude the following:
The issues are absurdly extreme for a reason. The objective is not the achievement of the issues themselves. It is the alteration of the psyche of the populace.
Once the public has spent several years having their heads divided between "far-right extremism" and what’s approved by the Ministry of Truth, enough people will have been converted into non-thinking proles that a bill can be put forward with the broad and intentionally non-specific objective to outlaw far-right extremism in all its forms.
In order to assure the passage of the bill, a significant majority of people will have to have already reached the stage in their new thought process that they feel that the law is not only justified but essential. Those people who can still think will be expected to comply.
The goal is not the elimination of cows; it’s the elimination of thinking and dissent. If we keep the above in mind as a process rather than an intended outcome, we have a greater ability to focus on the critical issue.
The core objective is nothing less than the elimination of individual thought and dissent. It’s essential in the creation of a fully collectivist state, and it’s at the very heart of the overall globalist objective.
Here's some magic that fits right into what you and Huxley are talking about. I don't know what scarier, this or the clots!
In this video, experts explain how the mRNA “trans”jections not only cause physical damage to organs but how they also damage the small capillaries in the brain, override the blood-brain barrier and eventually, lead to massive personality changes. They also discussed how the mRNA injections are literally breaking the will of some of those who received them.
The discussion took place during an International Crimes Investigative Committee (“ICIC”) session held last month. Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich interviewed Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor Dr. Karina Reiss, Dr. Naomi Wolf and Dr. Peter R. Breggin.
https://expose-news.com/2023/07/29/why-do-peoples-personalities-change-following-covid-vaccination/
In Brave New World Revisited, Huxley expands on what had occurred between the publishing of Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited(1932 and 1958 respectively). With the advent of television he points to different proofs of psychological techniques that were being perfected. Aldous was also privy to the Macys Conferences on Cybernetics and although he doesn’t mention it by name, I’m sure when he discusses these techniques he is thinking of that. Huxley also mentions the explosion of sociology degrees on college campuses and how these sociologists will be used to steer people. Huxley’s address to Berkeley students (which can be found online) is key.
While you consider it to be preconditioning, I've always operated from the Jungian perspective that the artists and writers tap into a Collective, which is wiser than the individual, and in opening to that channel, can be extremely prophetic. Not as a plan, but as a harbinger.
I find the notion that Orwell and Huxley were Machiavellians to be ridiculous. Both of the novels illustrate the dangers of the forms of oligarchic hegemony which have been growing from strength to strength through the manipulation of technology and control of the mass media. Both men were staunch proponents of individual freedom and creativity, and equal rights for all.