14 Comments
User's avatar
CM Maccioli's avatar

I noticed chemtrails when my son was 8. He's 40 now. I said, "look Michael, what are those lines in the sky?" We counted 20 in tic-tac-toe formation. Twenty years later I mentioned chemtrails during chelation therapy amidst a full house of patients. They never heard of them and took out their cell phones to investigate. To this day, no one looks up.

Not so long ago Russian pilots escorted 2 chemtrail planes off their territory. Monsanto not in Russia either. Americans need to wake up to the colossal poisoning of our food, air, water and medical malpractice of our doctors who profit from our sickness & demise. It's just that simple.

Expand full comment
Jason Brain's avatar

I think it’s fair to say that since 2020 (at least) we little people have been subjected to TOTAL WARFARE – we are collateral damage (at best, perhaps we are the target) in an insane global drama for diabolical control and destruction of what’s natural and God-given.

Between both villains and dissidents flinging open the "Overton Window" together on this topic, the stigma has been reduced to say the least. Bill Gates has gone on mainstream news, explaining with animated diagrams how spraying into the atmosphere ("geoengineering") might reflect light and save us from climate change. Meanwhile a vice presidential candidate (none other than the awesome Nichole Shanahan) has tweeted extensively about this issue, including a very comprehensive interview that she posted recently on the topic of chemtrails.

Without a doubt, they are ramping it up (out here in the Seattle area myself). On sunny days the streaking comes as sure as the tides, and in obviously geometric alignment – not at all the usual flightpath of commercial airliners. Not only that, but I've seen chemtrail planes spewing at the same altitude as commercial jets that aren't releasing a trail at all; thanks for the clear "control" y'all!

Saw a chemtrail sprayed unusually low the other morning, and it blew down directly over my neighborhood. It smelled like a pulp mill once it settled, which suggests the chemicals might include hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and methyl mercaptan.

Both hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and methyl mercaptan are toxic gases. H2S is particularly dangerous, being second only to carbon monoxide as a cause of inhalational deaths. Exposure to high concentrations of H2S can lead to rapid unconsciousness and death. Methyl mercaptan, while potentially less toxic than H2S, can also cause serious health effects at high concentrations, including respiratory paralysis and central nervous system depression.

Expand full comment
GabeReal's avatar

It’s definitely about controlling the weather, IMO. I mean, they’ve been talking about it since the 60’s! “He who controls the weather, controls the world.”

As for the poisoning of humans and the environment, that’s probably just a byproduct, which the have ready-made “solutions” for, i.e. Gates/Monsano aluminum resistant seeds.

Expand full comment
Tereza Coraggio's avatar

Your unorthodox is my third paradigm, Franklin ;-)

Definitely agreed, and you're asking the right question: why?

https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/hazy-daze-and-tinfoil-skies

https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/white-sky-blues

https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/under-the-ominous-sky

I note that YT puts their definition of 'climate change' on all of them although I sure as hell never used that term.

Expand full comment
albert venezio's avatar

Excellent Franklin - Thank you!

Expand full comment
Katy Mejia's avatar

Counted 3 full days without chemtrails in the Hudson Valley. Never before has there been more than one or two days without fake clouds dimming the sun.

Expand full comment
Jeff M's avatar

Franklin, I'll say that I do believe the higher ups (not better people, but the ones in control, the elected but mainly the unelected like Billy Joe Jim Bob killmeister Gates) really don't want us around. We have become largely expendable and our entitled butts are not needed). Robots can do a lot of what we do. So there has been a history of poisoning by various means from pretty much any angle. In the water you have fluoride, on the crops there is routine glyphosate spraying of grains just before harvest, of course pesticides on most trees (even traces amounts from neighboring orchards on organic for sure), the garbage dyes in food, plenty of chemicals that Europe doesn't allow in food), the ridiculous amounts of vaccines that the young ones have to be subjected to......I can go on and on with this list.

These are targeted poisons. And aircraft also add to the mix. I believe that Jim Lee (Climateviewer) and Reinette Senum (Save Our Skies) and the crew at Climateviewer Chat have it right. And it way way worse than you are opining. Every single aircraft that has a running engine is spewing the under-refined fuel metals and any additives that are not destroyed by the combustion of the kerosene-based fuel. It is raining down on us routinely, and aircraft traffic continues to rise at several percent every year. It is particularly bad for people on the downwind side of airports, especially doing bluebird weather where the skies are blue. That temperature inversion will be trapping all of the maximum-thrust flight in the lowest layers below a. few thousand feet down low where your house is.

What is the point of putting out a 'chem' from 30,000-40,000' when most of it is going to fall in an ocean (70% chance of that as most of the planet is water, really deep water). Those metals encapsulated in the unburned soot are going to drift with the wind column into water and deserts. There is no targeting mechanism of those 'chems'. They will drift through the constantly changing winds as they slowly descend, at speeds from 150 knots in strong winter jetstreams to low wind speed areas in high pressure ridges. No targeting is possible. In the troposphere, where 95% of the aircraft fly a lot of it will wash out with thunderstorms that hit the tropopause, a common thing in summer. But some of it will slowly drop out, the nano-sized particles that become a part of the cirrus clouds drifting in the wind. How fast do they fall? I'd like to see someone calculate that. Any Einsteins out there? I doubt there is a research paper. It depends on the winds, the stability of the columns of air (updrafts/downdrafts?) the weight of the particles etc. Too many variables. Weeks to months? Yes, maybe. Anything that gets into the stratosphere where the upward and downward motions are minimal it can stay up there for years, circling the planet multiple times especially if entrained in a 100 knot jetstream. You could not find a worse way to 'target' someone somewhere. And which pilots are going to flip the 'chems ON' switch as they fly into or near that cirrus cloud where the persistent 'chems' have to be to see them stick around.

I can give all kinds of weather data and charts and radiosonde data to support this. But most people will stop reading in seconds, eyes glazing over. TMI for most. I did this with one of your articles a few months ago. Not many comments. Most people will not put in the time to learn this stuff.

Those lines in the sky are contrails. Even the persistent ones. And they are also chemtrails. But unfortunately for us every one you don't see is a chemtrail. We are being slowly poisoning ourselves every time we fly. And when I go on RAAMB slider I can in 5 minutes find those contrails covering maybe 5% of the planet, and watch them turn into cirrus clouds and spread out up against the tropopause or another inversion above them. Easy and fast to do so. And use the Windy app Contrail Finder to tell you the levels they should be showing up. It works, and it works well. You don't see persistent chems in pure blue skies where the dewpoint depression is 10 degrees. It is all about the atmospheric conditions whether you see them. Too dry? Not happening? Too warm? Not happening. The conditions have to be right, and it is easy to show anyone that is open minded enough to learn. A 2nd grader could use the apps to figure out if a c-trail should be visible for a long period of time.

And if you use a specific app it shows what a c-trail will look like if some aircraft is doing loops. Checkbox lower left corner has to be ticked off, and then enter the wind speed and direction and also aircraft speed. https://contrailscience.com/contrail-simulations/

But every time you use Amazon to order something it is flown in by one of the delivery services. Every flight you take, you are contributing to our poisoning. Sheesh......FedEx is just at my house. I am contributing to the problem. Unfortunately. It is going to be a hard habit to break for all of us.

Expand full comment
TheyLied's avatar

Excellent article!

.

Also see Geoengineering and the plot to control humankind via Nanotechnology, Synthetic Biology, HAARP, Chemtrails, 5G/6G and more

https://theylied.substack.com/p/theylied-geoengineering-and-the-plot

Expand full comment
Cheerio's avatar

"We do know that these trails do leave heavy traces of chemicals in the drinking water, " I would love to know your source on this knowledge... so hard to prove anything these days... and connecting the dots to the actual cause especially... like the elephant in the room that everyone sees but cannot talk about.

Global Research: Climate Instability Worldwide: Does the US Military “Own the Weather”?

“Weaponizing the Weather” as an Instrument of Modern Warfare?

https://www.globalresearch.ca/does-the-us-military-own-the-weather-weaponizing-the-weather-as-an-instrument-of-modern-warfare/5608728?pdf=5608728

ENMOD Accountability ACT - Jim Lee Climate Viewer

https://climateviewer.com/downloads/presentations/environmental-modification-accountability-act-jim-lee-climateviewer.pdf

Now this sounds like you are listening to the guy hired to keep people AT MOST FEAR - Dane Wiggington:

"There’s other info that shows that yes, these are from airplanes and that pilots (online videos) can spray them at will, but the flight patterns in which these trails occur don’t align with regular commercial traffic flight patterns—only military patterns."

First of all 'spray' is a reference to herbicide treatments over farmlands or forests for pest control or monoculture tactics. Chem/Contrails are often referred to as 'spray' by common folk so I get your drift (pun intended) but if you are entering into the world of geoengineering - a lot of people who are scientists and especially geoengineers become very confused when we speak terminology that is incorrect and thus we get ignored by the 'powers' that be...

Cloud seeding patterns is another 'spray' condition that creates trails that are not aligned with the sky ways... these generally are patterns that look like a flight lesson circling around a region... like a race horse track... cloud seeding started in 1910??? something like that.... Ski Hills typically do cloud seeding from the ground I believe there is more ground based cloud seeding possibly than air based.

"What’s been told to us is that these are “condensation trails” from airplanes, but when observed, the condensation trails don’t last as long as these chemtrails (even though some info says they can last that long1)."

I do like the resource note on this for certain... BUT contrails are chemtrails that haven't been condensed - right??? Planes are farting out the same emissions whether they fly at altitudes to create condensed trails or not and are 'clear' they are both full of toxins...

This comment also rings of 'Dane' because he redirecting people away from the 'plane pollution' factor... is that the resource you're referencing to here? :)

"As far as why, I’m curious if it’s simply to “troll” citizens, as I can’t see why they would purposely blatantly poison citizens."

You ask "WHY???" The question could also be "Out of what was Eugenics born"

Depopulation is the Malthusian based Agenda 21 created in Rio de Janeiro in 1992... Thomas Malthus, a pastor, stated in 1798

"The Monstrous «Goodwill» of Thomas Malthus

So what exactly did this Malthusian doctrine imply, which first inspired Darwin and later Strong alongside other disciples of the Club of Rome. Let’s allow Malthus to explain himself:

«It is an evident truth that, whatever may be the rate of increase in the means of subsistence, the increase of population must be limited by it, at least after the food has once been divided into the smallest shares that will support life. All the children born beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this level must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons. […] To act consistently therefore we should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction which we compel nature to use. […] In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations.* But above all we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases; and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders. If by these and similar means the annual mortality were increased from 1 in 36 or 40, to one in 18 or 20, we might probably every one of us marry at the age of puberty, and yet few be absolutely starved. If however we all marry at this age and yet still continue our exertions to impede the operations of nature, we may rest assured that all our efforts will be vain. Nature will not, nor cannot, be defeated in her purposes. The necessary mortality must come in some form or other; and the extirpation of one disease will only be the signal for the birth of another perhaps more fatal. […] Political evils would probably be added to physical. A people goaded by constant distress, and visited by frequent returns of famine, could not be kept down but by a cruel despotism.»

«*[…] It appears, therefore, that we have nothing more to do than to settle people in marshy situations, and oppress them by a bad government.»

https://canadianpatriot.org/2023/06/23/from-malthus-to-wef-2023/

Thank 'God' for Rudolf Steiner

"Rudolf Steiner’s Warning of Social Malthusianism

Although the world would look different with Aurelio Peccei and Alexander King’s founding of the main branch of the Club of Rome 50 years later, in 1916 Rudolf Steiner could still make the following remark regarding the ideas of Malthus:

«Out of those emerged a principle which, I would say, thank God, only blinded a few for a short period of time, […] the principle of social Malthusianism.»

What is also quite interesting is the Swords use in words like Human - we are merely a hue of man... there is in reality a palpably touchable man - the hue of man is that which is entwined in the slavery system by design of the British Imperialists/Club of Rome/Elite people who are 'in charge' of everything...

Peace out....

Expand full comment
Luc Lelievre's avatar

We live in difficult times. Seem these thugs are unstoppable. Seems too we can't destroy them before they destroy us!

Expand full comment
Geoengineering Free Canada's avatar

Oh my. First of all a sky cannot become a weapon and is not 'sprayed' at all. Have you ever considered to look into the history of what and when things have changed and we started to notice the now persistent lines in the sky? Have you ever considered to look into the atmospheric conditions why these lines are visible today but not the next day? There is no pumps and pipes tuned on and off to create those lines. The planes flying at a certain altitude leave contrails that are creating clouds that are blocking the sun even if you see them or not. Called POLLUTION not spraying. Worst case scenario SAI (Stratospheric Aerosol Injection).

The true spraying is happening in much lower altitude and refers to herbicides/adulticides/pesticides or even cloud seeding. Cloud seeding btw is weather modification not geoengineering!

Feel free to join us to get your terminology straight and quit the mis/disinformation a la Wigington.

https://www.geoengineeringfreecanada.com /https://weathermodificationhistory.com/

Expand full comment
thelightpaper's avatar

Knowing what we know about those who rule the world, if they could control the weather, would they?

You know the answer to that.

Last two years, continually wet weather; this year, bone dry.

All by itself.

No need for haarp and controlling the ionosphere plus spraying of various chemcials from privately-hired ex-commercial aircraft (eg, evergreen, now disbanded after being found out.)

Florida has banned it. Several other states too.

Deniers are weird, when you can see what happens with your own eyes from 6am. Sometimes they are clearing the skies too though, and we don't mind that so much.

Expand full comment