If They’ve Lied About The News, Why Wouldn’t They Lie About History
Also, Why Wouldn't They Lie About Religion?
What other historical events could we have been given official narratives that were far from the truth?
On September 11, 2001, I was in middle school. Early that morning, I remember seeing all our teachers huddling around discussing something that had occurred. A couple of hours later, we were told to go home.
Any kid would be excited to go home, but from the energy that all the adults displayed, something bad had happened. Once we got home, it was all over the news what had occurred.
I remember being in shock at the atrocities committed and never even thought to question the story until the year 2014. I was in my hotel room and was introduced to this documentary my brother sent me, known as “The Zeitgeist.”
Released in 2007, it first touched on religion but then introduced the 9/11 event as an organized, planned event from the inside out. The Zeitgeist was the first piece of information that introduced me to false flags, alternate views, and, shall I say, unorthodox perspectives.
Thus began a decade-long journey down the rabbit hole, where I found myself questioning everything I had been taught. It was a profound awakening to the power of propaganda, and how it was subtly reinforced by daily events such as the news. This realization allowed me to discern the true ‘fake news’ and see through the veil of illusion.
In March 2020, the world witnessed the unfolding of what appeared to be a monumental event: the Covid pandemic. Drawing from my experiences over the past six years, I could discern the familiar propaganda techniques of a false flag campaign. Now, four years on, it’s clear how the news media’s narratives and propaganda shaped our perception of reality during that period, which has now become a ‘historical fact.’
Author’s Note: Knowing that COVID was a huge propaganda campaign to get individuals to get the vaccine, I was able to use the powers of religious exemptions to reject taking the shot and keep my job. I write about that experience here in this article.
A few years ago, James Corbett introduced me to the individual known as Philip Zelikow. From Llama 3 GPT, we read the following:
“Philip Zelikow, a former US government official and historian, has been involved in shaping the official narrative of various significant events, including:
The 9/11 Commission Report (2004): Zelikow was the executive director of the 9/11 Commission, which investigated the September 11 attacks.
The Bush Administration’s response to the 9/11 attacks: Zelikow served as a senior advisor to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and was involved in shaping the administration’s response to the attacks.
The COVID-19 pandemic response: Zelikow has been a key figure in shaping the global response to the pandemic, particularly in the early stages. He has worked closely with the World Health Organization (WHO), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and other global health authorities.”
Zelikow has been accused of perpetuating a “narrative” or a specific interpretation of events rather than an objective account. Critics argue that he has downplayed or omitted certain facts and perspectives to support a predetermined narrative.”
When one realizes that individuals and positions exist like that of Philip Zelikow, one has to ask:
…if the pandemic has an official narrative,
…and 9/11 has an official narrative to it,
…and we know these official narratives are further from the truth,
What other historical events could we have been given official narratives that were far from the truth?
That’s what I aim to explore in the following two articles. The first article will be on the most significant world event before 9/11, and that would be the Holocaust. For us to simply accept what’s been told about any part of history simply because it was taught to us is incredibly naive.
With this mindset, we will examine this historical event to see what is official and what the alternative narratives portray. Once you find out that the moon landings and nuclear weapons were propagandized events from an earlier time — and have yet to be utilized again — you start to realize a lot of our history may be propagandized. The famous saying comes into play here: if you think the news is fake, wait till you find out about history.
But we’re not only going to discuss history; we’re also going to discuss religion — specifically Christianity. For us to ignore the political power that religion has and only view it from a spiritual perspective also incites an incredibly naive view.
In my many podcasts, I’ve talked about the political power of the Roman church and how that became military in existence all the way to the level of an empire, in so much that one would purposely have to look away to not see how the faith was used as a tool of conquest.
We must understand this because some of the tenets we believe today are due to this political warfare within the faith. One example I would like to use is Francisco Ribera.
From Llama 3, we read the following:
“Francisco Ribera was a Jesuit priest who proposed a Futurist interpretation of the Book of Revelation in the 16th century. Some points of his view include:
Prophecies in the Book of Revelation were to be fulfilled in a future literal seven-year period.
The Antichrist would be a single individual, not a system or institution.
The Antichrist would be a Jew who would rebuild the temple in Jerusalem.
The Antichrist would abolish the Christian religion, deny Christ, and pretend to be God.
The Antichrist would conquer the world in a literal three-and-a-half-year period before the second coming of Christ.”
I used this example because this Jesuit’s futuristic view is what many Christians hold today as the accurate view of the book of Revelation. As I’ve stated in another podcast, the Jesuit organization was the church’s response to the Protestant Reformation.
We need to realize that the only reason for Francisco’s ideology is due to the fact that the Protestant Reformation claimed that the Roman church and the Pope were the Antichrist on earth — and with good reason, as the church fit the description of the false messiah. (Another topic worthy of future discussion).
This move by Francisco shifted the view from the Roman Church and the evils it had done and placed it in some distant future to where millions of Christians await that day instead of realizing that the many depictions of the “Antichrist” are with us in this very day.
When it comes to religion, I aim to open up a new perspective. If we consider that one creator created us all, then we all have a unique creation story, not just the one we’re familiar with. I want to explore these other creation stories and their profound implications for humanity, inviting us all to ponder the vastness of our collective narratives.
To close, history and religion are two concepts that fulfill the human experience. Unfortunately, they can also be manipulated and used as concepts to control the mass populace.
Only by awakening and examining our history and religion can we separate the fallacies from the realities. I hope you enjoy these articles and look forward to your feedback as they’re published. Thanks for the time and attention in reading these articles.
Ashe.
Call To Action
If you enjoyed this article, please consider taking action to show your appreciation.
You can share it with a friend, restack it with your thoughts, or leave a comment with feedback.
If you really enjoyed it, you can become a paid subscriber or make a small donation.
If you found this article insightful, you might enjoy the wealth of knowledge in the book. Signed copies are available for a more personal touch.
I really like how you question everything. Everything.
We are controlled through language. Just take the word history for example. History = his story. Define a word differently, such as gay, and afterwards people assign a different meaning to it. What changed? The mind. The perception. The story behind the meaning.
The new meaning involves repetition until the new definition becomes the new reality.
Zeitgeist was a real wake up call for many. Religion is made up of stories. Lots of stories. Conflicting stories. Peaceful stories. Violent stories. Essentially, religion exists to tell stories to change behavior.
Language exists to change behavior. Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that most things we do and think are for the purpose of changing behavior. So, we might ask ourselves, qui bono? Who benefits from changing behavior?
As humans, we are social animals, and as such, we form hierarchies. Hierarchies can sort levels of skill, power levels, etc. and can be observed and experienced in many parts of society, in many different forms. We even have a symbol that connotes hierarchy. The pyramid. It’s even on our one dollar Federal Reserve Note. Another one can be a religious figure, or an image of a religious figure.
So, who is on top of the hierarchy? That depends on which hierarchy one focuses on.
Since religious beliefs form around the idea of (usually) a central deity, where did that idea originate? Linguistically, all ideas of a god or gods can be traced to stars (our sun), the moon, and planets. No one has, so far, traced any mention of god-beings prior to the “heavenly bodies” in our solar system.
Today, most religions focus on a human-like deity. The explanation is too lengthy for this response here.
Part of the shift involves oral history into written history. Oral stories about creation were passed down generation after generation and were told precisely to audiences who were familiar with the story and could and would correct the storyteller if they changed the story.
Once stories were written, people could share stories far and wide as they traveled to different populations to share their stories. They no longer had an audience to correct any variations in the official story.
So, how long has history been written and rewritten? How long have people been telling stories?
Back to the present, we have a lot of media and a lot of storytelling and storytellers. If anyone believes that everyone is telling the truth about history when, through contemporary media, we can see and hear stories, changes in stories, and disappearance of stories to change behavior in ways we are unlikely even aware of, one has to be very naive at best.
It’s in the questions that bring us different information and new solutions. Learn how to ask the right questions to get the answers you seek.
Question everything.
If the news is fake, imagine how fake history is. —Yuri Bezmenov (Substack Author)