Metaphysical Terms in the Physical World
Occult Terminology In Our Scientific Understanding Of Reality
The other day, I came across an article by
on pandemics. I agree 100% with his premise of pandemics—specifically viral pandemics—and commented, “Hey, have you looked into the whole viral debate, as in, do viruses exist?” That comment turned into an unfortunate exchange, and the question wasn’t even discussed. You can read the conversation for yourself here.My point in asking was that his data has clearly shown that there’s nothing here regarding these pandemics, specifically from the viral perspective. I agree with that, and my stance is that it’s because viruses don’t exist.
In my last article, I pointed out how specific individuals with high positions in the scientific field who dabbled in the mystic arts have controlled reality’s perspective using science. I referenced the documentary “Heliosorcery.” The documentary called out five individuals, three of whom were Galileo, Copernicus, and Newton. Between Galileo and Copernicus, these two had a great impact on the world’s movement towards this heliocentric view of the world.
I found the documentary interesting because it showed some negative aspects of alchemy and hermeticism. However, that’s what nature is—nature is power, and whoever uses it can mold reality as they decide to. Newton was discussed as a well-known alchemist—which I’ve written about on this publication here. But between Newton, Galileo, and others of their time, it makes one wonder if they used hidden, occult knowledge in their scientific work.
To Matthew’s credit, I love his phrase “MOBS,” which stands for the Military Occult Banking System, because I think that’s a very accurate depiction of the world. Unfortunately, since that conversation was somewhat disheartening, who knows if we could dive deeper into that topic.
However, this is the idea behind my article, the many paths to freedom. Some, like myself, choose the unorthodox path, while others appear to still go about scientific rigor, but unfortunately, that scientific rigor contains them within the realm and perspective of Plato’s Cave. More can be discussed about this, but I recommend reading my articles, “Many Paths to Freedom,” “Lies in the Truth Community,” and “Gatekeepers of Information,” to get a full view of my perspective.
Returning to Newton and others’ works, let’s take a step back and examine some of their work. Is it possible that we can see some occult terminologies mixed in with terminologies that we know about our current world? For background, one of the books I’m reading is Codex Esoterica, which explains the occult and the metaphysical. In it, two definitions are mentioned that have quite impactful meanings.
The first is the definition of gravity. From a scientific point of view, gravity - discovered by our occultist Newton - is known as the pulling in of weight, force, etc. Gravity is why we don’t float off the earth; thanks to gravity, the planets stay in motion.
However, some people argue that there is no such thing as gravity and that density explains every single phenomenon (ex, Helium balloons are not held by gravity because helium is less dense than Oxygen). Interestingly, in the book Codex Esoterica, this terminology is used on the esoteric level as it describes consciousness. From the book, we read that:
“The boundary of the particles, what we perceive as mass or the density of a thing, is just an electromagnetic field, like magnets repelling each other. Same with cell walls, tissue boundaries, beaches, bubbles, clouds, and all other things within 3D space. The closer and tighter these particles get together the higher the density of a thing. This density is what the theory of gravity attempts to explain. Gravity is the vortex of conscious energy required to observe something “pulling” that energy into it.”
This is a metaphysical definition for conscious energy; however, it’s easy to see how someone can say there is this term called gravity that holds physical objects together, and this force is the reason why planets revolve around the sun. You’ve taken a metaphysical component and made it fit a scientismic model of the heliocentric world you are looking to create. This is the physical implication of introducing the metaphysical component, especially when the public is none the wiser about the origin of the occult terminology.
So the question arises: Are we seeing other individuals versed in the art of the occult bring metaphysical terminologies into the physical domain?
The other term to discuss is the term of the Big Bang. The term the Big Bang has an evolutionist feel as it describes the nihilistic origin of how this world came to be. The Theory of Evolution establishes this material world of Scientism. It looks to remove the spiritual world of the Theory of Creation. However, if we look at the term from the metaphysical perspective, we’re actually describing that moment where consciousness split into physical reality, as explained by the Codex Esoterica here.
The Bible states that the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters first, then God spoke, the big bang was a sound, and then the harmonics started to form due to the split... As the Big Bang expands, the knowledge of unity fractalizes into the different levels of creation. This creates distortion, a way for consciousness to know itself by reassembling the parts... The “Big Bang” is the split of this unity into duality, this polarity creates a split with infinite harmonics creating the distortion of unity’s perspective of everything.
Author’s Note: Remember, in my article, “Lies in the Truth Community,” we are talking about an ideology here in Evolution, and even evolutionists know that the theory has been disproven. However, they choose to believe in the theory as it upholds their faith in their religion of Scientism. This example shows that we’re going through religious warfare: The Religion of Scientism and its nihilistic material world, or The Religion of the Creator and its divine spiritual aspect of the world.
So again, with the Big Bang, is this another example of metaphysical terminology being used to describe the physical world? It makes sense because these concepts make sense on a metaphysical plane, but on the physical plane, we’re building a reality that does not exist.
I’m quite sad that Matthew and I cannot get to this level of conversation because I believe there’s excellent work in the MOBS frame. I look to build up the MOBS frame because it is quite powerful. When you look at the world from the military, occult, and banking systems, as I touch on in my book, you really start to see how our worldview has been shaped.
To close, since this all started with the topic of viruses, I wanted to touch on the word’s origin. The etymology of the word virus means poison, and we can see how the poisoning can appear “viral,” as there’s a poisoning of the mind because there’s a component of fear. One cannot distinguish between the flu or stress-induced sickness, and it’s easy to say the spiritual disease that one is suffering is due to a physical condition, as we do with conditions such as depression. To this day, I still await studies that prove the isolation of a virus, taking into account the fraud that does occur within the industry. For one to think that scientific fraud does not occur is incredibly naive.
Well, that’s it. I think this is just an ideological exploration, but I’m curious about any thoughts and if there are examples that can align here.
Thank you for the time and Ashe.
Call To Action
If you enjoyed this article, please consider taking action to show your appreciation.
You can share it with a friend, restack it with your thoughts, or leave a comment with feedback.
If you really enjoyed it, you can become a paid subscriber or make a small donation.
If you found this article insightful, you might enjoy the wealth of knowledge in the book. Signed copies are available for a more personal touch.
I read the comment thread on Mathew Crawford's article linked above and his response to your questions was way outside rational conduct. Becoming angry, accusing someone of being part of a psyop, a bot to muddy the waters in the dissident movement, resorting to personal attacks, and twisting their words for simply asking a question about whether he has explored the existence of viruses is the pot calling the kettle black. His logical fallacies of appealing to consensus and appealing to authority regarding the existence of viruses indicate that he has not researched the subject of infectious disease and viral isolation. His response was essentially: “Everybody knows viruses exist, including my wife, so why don't you just shut up and go away? You're banned from commenting.”
There are highly trained and experienced scientists who have done deep work on the virus theory and have proven to me that the scientists Matthew appeals to are working from a faulty premise: The amino acid sequences they are working with are from isolated virus particles and not computer-generated models. Virology and the infectious disease model, including bacterial diseases, are fraught with assumptions and fraud. Essentially, they assume their hypothesis it true and manufacture the evidence to support it. It is no different than astrophysicists who look at the heavens and believe that the mathematical models they are working with are based upon real science, when in reality the assumptions about the properties of the lights in the sky came first, and the math was created to prove the assumptions. They are solving for X when they already decided what X is.
Gravity, density, science, occult, geocentric, heliocentric, it all is so ridiculous.
The so called science is a makeshift collection of more or less random concepts, strongly pushed to be coherent, consistent and uniform. This tendency is the ultimate bias which disables the capacity to observe and reflect upon the Life. Now and then, the scientists stumble upon unsolvable issues and - how else - they eagerly detour into alternatives, like particle vs. wave models or Einstein’s fantasies. Then, the inconsistencies matter no more, maybe because they are “explained” by one of their own.
Another huge bias is the idea that we can actually explain a thing or two. To explain them, we would need to be aware of and know the context, or the environment in which the particular phenomenon occurs. But we don’t know this. We don’t even know what “shape” the Earth is. Which is pretty important, because shapes form spatial relationships, possibly affecting everything there is in some ways. We have no idea whether the Earth is moving or not. And if it is moving, in what ways and - WHY?
Yet another huge huge bias is the frivolous manipulation of “time” by scientists. 10 million years back or forth, who cares. The more, the better, it will sound more scientific and it will facilitate more funding. These are the “discoveries” of people who a) live - in their whole lifetime - within about 20 years of “conscious” understanding of the concepts they push around, b) have minds which are intrinsically unable to conceptualize more than a few weeks into the past and are absolutely unable to reflect upon the future.
And there are processes which are still incomprehensible to us. Photosynthesis - no one knows how it works or how it is possible. Digestion of food, including by humans - no one knows how it works. Assimilation of water by living organisms, including humans - no one can explain what is happening there. And the most well know human miracle which no one can explain: how come two cells from two different organisms merge and something is happening which results in a continuous creation, transformation and elimination of millions of cells over dozens of years?
Even on the mental plane, we have no idea what is happening within us. Why biases? What is their function? Why our perception is extremely limited and by default resistant to development? Why do we need schools? No other being on the Earth needs schools - every single child of every single species on the Earth has complete knowledge of how to handle the environment. Why humans are the only species which is by default unfit to live here?
There is so much more…