Thank you, Franklin, for your clear exposition of this important foundational lie. Many people are "getting bigger" as you say, and realizing the hogwashing they've been through. Thank you also for sharing my latest video. I may not have all the answers as to the shape of our world, but I sure have a lot of questions regarding the lies we've been fed.
Thank you Peggy! For all your work on this topic and others. So glad many are getting bigger — and together, we will find the truths to all these lies!
This is fascinating to me. Thank you for opening this born & raised Catholics’ mind. Could you direct me to more resources that explain what’s really happening. Why is the sun appear to be rising and setting? If we’re not spinning, how does this happen? What are the glowing lights in the sky if not distant stars? Why does the night sky change throughout the year? What do you mean when you say “ether”? I love everything you’re saying but my logical brain needs to understand it more. Thank you!
This is perfect. Thank you! I do have your book but am only a few chapters in. I’ll read these articles and the rest of your book. Excited to learn. Feel so sad that our religion/spirituality has been hijacked for so long. God’s plans for us are so much bigger than what we’ve been “taught”. God bless you for all you’re doing to try to help us reach our full God-intended potential! ❤️
I’m not sure about the magic of Einstein, but I will read the article to learn your angle. But from other insightful people the aether surrounding us in an ontological world, totally deviate from the material world that Einstein seems to have glommed onto.
I went to Bitchute and typed in Flat Earth. I kept an open mind and read, read and read some more. That was the final straw for me. NOTHING is sacred but God, whether you believe or don't believe, no matter. The lies we have been told are astounding. Stick you toe in that pond Jenna. You won't believe how easily we were fooled. Of particular interest to me was Urbano Monti's flat earth map from 1587. Stunning!!
Flat Earth Dave has a wealth of information for those new to the subject. He offers three Bitcoins to anyone that can prove the Earth is a globe. No takers so far.
Michelson-Morley didn’t disprove aether — they disproved a static mechanical aether.
Miller and others found aether drift but were ignored or buried during Einstein's rise.
Sagnac and Michelson-Gale confirmed relative motion through a medium.
Modern physics hides aether under new names: "quantum foam," "zero-point energy," "vacuum fluctuations" — because they can’t explain light or gravity without a medium.
The true aether is dynamic, living, energy/mass substratum, not mechanical gas or liquid.
Stationary plane, level Horeyezon. It's important because it has to do with our sovereignty, centerdness and connection with God. That's why they want everyone believing they are spinning out of control, it's the most pushed to influence the subconscious mind next to germ theory. The ancients knew our cosmology. If one believes they are spinning in chaos they find no meaning except from the false authority that steps in to fill the manufactured gap. Even people who recognize most of the lies still hold on tight to this one from an intellectual capacity because they have done a good job with psyops inside psyops to discount the beauty of our contained system.
Love this article, thanks. I have been researching flat earth for a few years, and one question I can't figure out is why the stars are different in the southern and northern hemispheres (for lack of a better word) Any theories? And what exactly are the stars, anyway?
Ann! This was a great comment and it really made me think. I did some research and here’s what I found:
The “different stars in the north and south” assumes the Earth is a spinning ball and we’re seeing two different hemispheres. But if we rethink the framework—say, on a level plane model with a central North Pole and an outer boundary (often called the Antarctic Circle)—the sky itself may rotate above us like a dome or firmament, with stars moving in circular patterns around a central axis.
What people call “hemispheres” could actually be rings of observation, with stars appearing differently depending on where you are on the plane and how atmospheric lensing or etheric currents affect visibility.
As for what stars are—that’s where it gets even more fascinating. It’s becoming harder to believe they’re distant, burning balls of gas. They seem more like energetic entities or electromagnetic phenomena—vibrating points of light in the aether, possibly conscious or connected to larger spiritual intelligences. This gives a lot of credence to when in Biblical times, they discussed the "planets" (wandering stars) —and when Paul mentions "principalities." We can even see cymatic patterns when looking at stars through high-zoom amateur lenses.
Again, great question as it really made me think on this. I'm definitely going to look to do some research here and put an article out on this!
They attempted to detect the "aether wind" — thinking that, as the Earth moves through space, light would travel faster or slower depending on direction through the "aether."
Their result:
They detected no significant shift in the speed of light, which challenged the mechanical aether model — NOT the existence of an underlying medium itself.
> Important: They never claimed "the aether doesn't exist" — only that it wasn't detected in that mechanical form they assumed.
2. Dayton Miller Experiments (1920s-30s)
What happened:
Dayton Miller, a physicist far more precise than Michelson-Morley, repeated the tests on mountains to reduce interference —
and DID detect a consistent aether drift.
> Fact: His results showed systematic sidereal (star-relative) motion.
Cover-up: His work was later dismissed during the rise of Einsteinian relativity without honest refutation.
(Convenient for the narrative.)
3. Sagnac Experiment (1913)
What happened:
Georges Sagnac showed that rotating an interferometer produced detectable phase shifts, proving that motion relative to a medium affects light — a huge blow against pure "relativity."
> Real meaning: Light’s behavior changes with rotation relative to something — the aether.
4. Michelson-Gale-Pearson Experiment (1925)
What happened:
They measured the rotation of the Earth using light, again detecting the aether wind associated with Earth's spin.
> Key detail: Rotation was measurable through an aether effect.
5. More Modern Ether Drift Experiments
Shankland et al. (1955) tried to reanalyze Miller's data but couldn't eliminate ether-drift readings without introducing subjective "noise corrections."
Kozyrev (Russia, mid-20th century) and others continued experiments suggesting a dynamic, energetic medium — not empty vacuum.
This has been an interesting thread to read! We can talk all day about how the Earth is what shape it is yada yada yada and there are lots of opinions, and I respect those opinions! But I would like to get the truth and since I am a believer in God and know that he is real, I believe the only way to get the truth is to have it revealed by the Holy Spirit! People lie, the Internet lies, books lie, therefore the only way to find the truth is to ask God, and if we sincerely want to know, he will reveal it to us! If not, everything is opinion.
Thanks for this comment Max. I recommend you check out the YouTube video i posted “heliosorcery” — it shows why the level, earth at the center of the universe model brings us so much closer to God.
From deep reading, I 100% have evolved to this same understanding and way of thinking about the world around me including such divine access to God our creator - without any props, religious establishments and none of the “middle men - ie priests, pastors, etc..
Our shared consciousness and all the blessings Ive personally experienced are fluid and Im convinced, are granted to those of us open to truth, love, compassion and good will to others.
Powerful & informative - I've known about the toxic vaccines for 35 years, 9/11 lies in 2007, moon landing lies the past 4+ years, our Earth being the center of the Universe while not spinning, that's a new one - opening my eyes & heart one Truth @ a time, for I believe our Creator lives in the Light of Truth. Gratitude & blessings to you Franklin ...
Star Trek was produced 3 years prior to the first rocket launch to condition the peasants for space travel. The Bermuda Triangle myth was invented 2 weeks after the first rocket launch to scare people away from the rocket splash down/burial area.
The spinning earth model explains neatly all of the following observable effects, I would love to hear your explanations:
- The observable fact that airplanes travel faster when they go eastwards than westwards
- The observable fact that a water vortex starting from still water will always spin one way in the northern hemisphere, and the other in the southern.
- The observable movement of the Foucault pendulum
Thanks for the thoughtful comment—let me walk through each point quickly.
For the eastward vs. westward airplane travel, that’s mainly due to jet streams, not Earth’s spin. If the Earth were truly spinning at 1,000 mph eastward, a helicopter hovering should see the ground move underneath it. But we don’t observe that. The mainstream explanation that the atmosphere “moves perfectly” with the Earth is just circular reasoning.
On the water vortex, the Coriolis effect is real at very large scales (like hurricanes), but it’s way too weak to affect small systems like toilets or sinks. How water spins when draining depends mostly on the shape of the basin and how the water was poured, not the hemisphere you’re in.
For the Foucault pendulum, it’s often presented as proof of a spinning Earth, but not all pendulums behave the same, and many are manually adjusted to keep moving. It’s more a case of interpretation fitting the model people already believe than direct, independent proof of rotation.
And for the Coriolis effect on projectiles, it does exist slightly for very long-range artillery. But even that subtle drift can also be explained by electromagnetic field dynamics or etheric forces acting on the system—not necessarily because the Earth is rotating.
Bottom line: the phenomena you mentioned exist, but assuming they can only be explained by Earth’s spin is still an interpretation, not direct evidence. There are alternative explanations when you step outside the heliocentric framework.
Appreciate you engaging with this — good questions.
Good point to bring up—but again, it depends on what framework you're starting from.
The difference in the night sky between north and south doesn’t only work on a spinning globe model. A fixed, motionless Earth with a rotating firmament or layered ether could also account for the visible movement of the stars. Different star paths and rotations can be explained by field dynamics in a geocentric model—where the heavens move, not the Earth.
When people say "it only works on a spinning globe," they’re assuming the heliocentric framework as the default. But if you step outside that assumption, there are alternative models that explain the observations without needing the ground beneath us to move.
At the end of the day, seeing stars move doesn’t automatically prove that Earth is moving. It simply proves that something is in motion—and I argue that it’s the stars, not us.
Good work brother, question everything we have been taught as fact, anything deemed to be “settled” needs to thought of as bullshit designed to keep us in fear and ignorance.
When you travel in a plane ✈️ and you look 👀 out the window of the plane ✈️ what you see is “Sea 🌊 level” as far as the eyes can see it’s level the pun is “See Level “ in the book 📖 of TEHILLIYM “Psalms “ it tells you that the earth was stretched out as a Tent ⛺️ that’s called the Dome. It also tells us that when the earth was flooding the heavens opened and water 💦 came out. We live under the water 💦 covered by the dome.
Little Peggy March's "Chariot" had windows? How was the water pumped back up above the Firmament? Governor Bangerter's pumps hadn't been made yet. (Besides, the head pressure is several thousand miles. Talk about the "Billion Kilowatt Dam" in "High Hopes"!)
You chose to answer what you considered a silly question, by asking a silly question? The water was cooled below its boiling point, while still above its freezing point. Works for all substances except mono-H and neutrinos, as far as I know. What has that to do with pumps and firmaments?
You really want to know? Hydrogen (protons and electrons) is primordial. It readily fuses to oxygen in all but the smallest stars. Burn some leftover hydrogen in oxygen, and there you go! Voilà!
Here's your plain:
La plaine, la plaine, la plaine n'aura plus de frontière
I agree Franklin, we are not small spinning beings. We are mighty loved and wonderfully made ⚔️
We are so! All matter has spin. Okay, I'm not convinced about the claims for the alleged properties of Higgs bosons.
Thank you, Franklin, for your clear exposition of this important foundational lie. Many people are "getting bigger" as you say, and realizing the hogwashing they've been through. Thank you also for sharing my latest video. I may not have all the answers as to the shape of our world, but I sure have a lot of questions regarding the lies we've been fed.
Thank you Peggy! For all your work on this topic and others. So glad many are getting bigger — and together, we will find the truths to all these lies!
This is fascinating to me. Thank you for opening this born & raised Catholics’ mind. Could you direct me to more resources that explain what’s really happening. Why is the sun appear to be rising and setting? If we’re not spinning, how does this happen? What are the glowing lights in the sky if not distant stars? Why does the night sky change throughout the year? What do you mean when you say “ether”? I love everything you’re saying but my logical brain needs to understand it more. Thank you!
Hi Jenna! All great questions and I’ve covered most of them in a lot of my older articles.
Here is a series that shows everything: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-spirituality-of-flat-earth
When it comes to why the sun appears rising and spinning, this would be your go-to article: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-the-flat-appears-round
The ether would be best described in the Einstein article and this excerpt from my book as well:
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-reality-of-magic
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-magic-of-albert-einstein
Hope these help! Let me know if there are more questions!
This is perfect. Thank you! I do have your book but am only a few chapters in. I’ll read these articles and the rest of your book. Excited to learn. Feel so sad that our religion/spirituality has been hijacked for so long. God’s plans for us are so much bigger than what we’ve been “taught”. God bless you for all you’re doing to try to help us reach our full God-intended potential! ❤️
'An End to the Upside-Down Universe' by Marc Gober is a great resource too
I’m not sure about the magic of Einstein, but I will read the article to learn your angle. But from other insightful people the aether surrounding us in an ontological world, totally deviate from the material world that Einstein seems to have glommed onto.
I went to Bitchute and typed in Flat Earth. I kept an open mind and read, read and read some more. That was the final straw for me. NOTHING is sacred but God, whether you believe or don't believe, no matter. The lies we have been told are astounding. Stick you toe in that pond Jenna. You won't believe how easily we were fooled. Of particular interest to me was Urbano Monti's flat earth map from 1587. Stunning!!
There is an excellent book you can read in one sitting called: "Flat Earth: Reforming Biblical Cosmology" by Robert Smith
Flat Earth Dave has a wealth of information for those new to the subject. He offers three Bitcoins to anyone that can prove the Earth is a globe. No takers so far.
https://flatearthdave.com/interviews/
The sun "sets" into tunnels into sheol so it can pass over and illuminate Europe and Asia.
https://youtu.be/64j-hsP9yBM?si=Z9zuGj3SEM-Uta9E
Michelson-Morley didn’t disprove aether — they disproved a static mechanical aether.
Miller and others found aether drift but were ignored or buried during Einstein's rise.
Sagnac and Michelson-Gale confirmed relative motion through a medium.
Modern physics hides aether under new names: "quantum foam," "zero-point energy," "vacuum fluctuations" — because they can’t explain light or gravity without a medium.
The true aether is dynamic, living, energy/mass substratum, not mechanical gas or liquid.
Thank you for these clarifications and additional insights/information! 🔥🔥🔥
My pleasure. The time for actual truth is here.
Reading your article made my head spin 😏 Fascinating stuff 👍
Stationary plane, level Horeyezon. It's important because it has to do with our sovereignty, centerdness and connection with God. That's why they want everyone believing they are spinning out of control, it's the most pushed to influence the subconscious mind next to germ theory. The ancients knew our cosmology. If one believes they are spinning in chaos they find no meaning except from the false authority that steps in to fill the manufactured gap. Even people who recognize most of the lies still hold on tight to this one from an intellectual capacity because they have done a good job with psyops inside psyops to discount the beauty of our contained system.
The superpowers, as well as Iran, wasted their money on Over The Horizon radar. </sarcasm>
I believe we are a stationary plain as well were we come to learn and experience. God keeps a loving and watchful eye on us.
Love this article, thanks. I have been researching flat earth for a few years, and one question I can't figure out is why the stars are different in the southern and northern hemispheres (for lack of a better word) Any theories? And what exactly are the stars, anyway?
Ann! This was a great comment and it really made me think. I did some research and here’s what I found:
The “different stars in the north and south” assumes the Earth is a spinning ball and we’re seeing two different hemispheres. But if we rethink the framework—say, on a level plane model with a central North Pole and an outer boundary (often called the Antarctic Circle)—the sky itself may rotate above us like a dome or firmament, with stars moving in circular patterns around a central axis.
What people call “hemispheres” could actually be rings of observation, with stars appearing differently depending on where you are on the plane and how atmospheric lensing or etheric currents affect visibility.
As for what stars are—that’s where it gets even more fascinating. It’s becoming harder to believe they’re distant, burning balls of gas. They seem more like energetic entities or electromagnetic phenomena—vibrating points of light in the aether, possibly conscious or connected to larger spiritual intelligences. This gives a lot of credence to when in Biblical times, they discussed the "planets" (wandering stars) —and when Paul mentions "principalities." We can even see cymatic patterns when looking at stars through high-zoom amateur lenses.
Again, great question as it really made me think on this. I'm definitely going to look to do some research here and put an article out on this!
🤣🤣🤣🤣Aether: Proven, Not Dismissed
1. Michelson-Morley Experiment (1887)
What they actually did:
They attempted to detect the "aether wind" — thinking that, as the Earth moves through space, light would travel faster or slower depending on direction through the "aether."
Their result:
They detected no significant shift in the speed of light, which challenged the mechanical aether model — NOT the existence of an underlying medium itself.
> Important: They never claimed "the aether doesn't exist" — only that it wasn't detected in that mechanical form they assumed.
2. Dayton Miller Experiments (1920s-30s)
What happened:
Dayton Miller, a physicist far more precise than Michelson-Morley, repeated the tests on mountains to reduce interference —
and DID detect a consistent aether drift.
> Fact: His results showed systematic sidereal (star-relative) motion.
Cover-up: His work was later dismissed during the rise of Einsteinian relativity without honest refutation.
(Convenient for the narrative.)
3. Sagnac Experiment (1913)
What happened:
Georges Sagnac showed that rotating an interferometer produced detectable phase shifts, proving that motion relative to a medium affects light — a huge blow against pure "relativity."
> Real meaning: Light’s behavior changes with rotation relative to something — the aether.
4. Michelson-Gale-Pearson Experiment (1925)
What happened:
They measured the rotation of the Earth using light, again detecting the aether wind associated with Earth's spin.
> Key detail: Rotation was measurable through an aether effect.
5. More Modern Ether Drift Experiments
Shankland et al. (1955) tried to reanalyze Miller's data but couldn't eliminate ether-drift readings without introducing subjective "noise corrections."
Kozyrev (Russia, mid-20th century) and others continued experiments suggesting a dynamic, energetic medium — not empty vacuum.
This has been an interesting thread to read! We can talk all day about how the Earth is what shape it is yada yada yada and there are lots of opinions, and I respect those opinions! But I would like to get the truth and since I am a believer in God and know that he is real, I believe the only way to get the truth is to have it revealed by the Holy Spirit! People lie, the Internet lies, books lie, therefore the only way to find the truth is to ask God, and if we sincerely want to know, he will reveal it to us! If not, everything is opinion.
Thanks for this comment Max. I recommend you check out the YouTube video i posted “heliosorcery” — it shows why the level, earth at the center of the universe model brings us so much closer to God.
I too felt a deep sense of comfort and solidity when I found out the truth about all this.
From deep reading, I 100% have evolved to this same understanding and way of thinking about the world around me including such divine access to God our creator - without any props, religious establishments and none of the “middle men - ie priests, pastors, etc..
Our shared consciousness and all the blessings Ive personally experienced are fluid and Im convinced, are granted to those of us open to truth, love, compassion and good will to others.
Awesome article!❤️💫
Powerful & informative - I've known about the toxic vaccines for 35 years, 9/11 lies in 2007, moon landing lies the past 4+ years, our Earth being the center of the Universe while not spinning, that's a new one - opening my eyes & heart one Truth @ a time, for I believe our Creator lives in the Light of Truth. Gratitude & blessings to you Franklin ...
Star Trek was produced 3 years prior to the first rocket launch to condition the peasants for space travel. The Bermuda Triangle myth was invented 2 weeks after the first rocket launch to scare people away from the rocket splash down/burial area.
The spinning earth model explains neatly all of the following observable effects, I would love to hear your explanations:
- The observable fact that airplanes travel faster when they go eastwards than westwards
- The observable fact that a water vortex starting from still water will always spin one way in the northern hemisphere, and the other in the southern.
- The observable movement of the Foucault pendulum
- The observable Coriolis force over a projectile
Thanks for the thoughtful comment—let me walk through each point quickly.
For the eastward vs. westward airplane travel, that’s mainly due to jet streams, not Earth’s spin. If the Earth were truly spinning at 1,000 mph eastward, a helicopter hovering should see the ground move underneath it. But we don’t observe that. The mainstream explanation that the atmosphere “moves perfectly” with the Earth is just circular reasoning.
On the water vortex, the Coriolis effect is real at very large scales (like hurricanes), but it’s way too weak to affect small systems like toilets or sinks. How water spins when draining depends mostly on the shape of the basin and how the water was poured, not the hemisphere you’re in.
For the Foucault pendulum, it’s often presented as proof of a spinning Earth, but not all pendulums behave the same, and many are manually adjusted to keep moving. It’s more a case of interpretation fitting the model people already believe than direct, independent proof of rotation.
And for the Coriolis effect on projectiles, it does exist slightly for very long-range artillery. But even that subtle drift can also be explained by electromagnetic field dynamics or etheric forces acting on the system—not necessarily because the Earth is rotating.
Bottom line: the phenomena you mentioned exist, but assuming they can only be explained by Earth’s spin is still an interpretation, not direct evidence. There are alternative explanations when you step outside the heliocentric framework.
Appreciate you engaging with this — good questions.
- The difference of the night sky visible in the northern vs southern hemisphere and its movement (rotation is opposite.)
Only works on a spinning globe earth.
Good point to bring up—but again, it depends on what framework you're starting from.
The difference in the night sky between north and south doesn’t only work on a spinning globe model. A fixed, motionless Earth with a rotating firmament or layered ether could also account for the visible movement of the stars. Different star paths and rotations can be explained by field dynamics in a geocentric model—where the heavens move, not the Earth.
When people say "it only works on a spinning globe," they’re assuming the heliocentric framework as the default. But if you step outside that assumption, there are alternative models that explain the observations without needing the ground beneath us to move.
At the end of the day, seeing stars move doesn’t automatically prove that Earth is moving. It simply proves that something is in motion—and I argue that it’s the stars, not us.
Appreciate the engagement.
Good work brother, question everything we have been taught as fact, anything deemed to be “settled” needs to thought of as bullshit designed to keep us in fear and ignorance.
When you travel in a plane ✈️ and you look 👀 out the window of the plane ✈️ what you see is “Sea 🌊 level” as far as the eyes can see it’s level the pun is “See Level “ in the book 📖 of TEHILLIYM “Psalms “ it tells you that the earth was stretched out as a Tent ⛺️ that’s called the Dome. It also tells us that when the earth was flooding the heavens opened and water 💦 came out. We live under the water 💦 covered by the dome.
Fascinating
Little Peggy March's "Chariot" had windows? How was the water pumped back up above the Firmament? Governor Bangerter's pumps hadn't been made yet. (Besides, the head pressure is several thousand miles. Talk about the "Billion Kilowatt Dam" in "High Hopes"!)
That’s a silly question, answer me this how was water 💦 made. H2O and don’t say hydrogen and two parts of oxygen. How did it turn into a liquid?
You chose to answer what you considered a silly question, by asking a silly question? The water was cooled below its boiling point, while still above its freezing point. Works for all substances except mono-H and neutrinos, as far as I know. What has that to do with pumps and firmaments?
You really want to know? Hydrogen (protons and electrons) is primordial. It readily fuses to oxygen in all but the smallest stars. Burn some leftover hydrogen in oxygen, and there you go! Voilà!
Here's your plain:
La plaine, la plaine, la plaine n'aura plus de frontière
La terre la terre sera notre domaine
Que j'aime que j'aime
Hear it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSxS40jeDW0
Complete lyrics at https://lyricstranslate.com/fr/petula-clark-chariot-lyrics.html